Summary:
{{Template}}
[[Yvor Winters]] is known for his argument attacking the "[[fallacy of imitative form]]," a term which he coined:
:"To say that a [[poet]] is justified in employing a disintegrating form in order to express a feeling of disintegration, is merely a sophistical justification for bad poetry, akin to the Whitmanian notion that one must write loose and sprawling poetry to "express" the loose and sprawling American continent. In fact, all feeling, if one gives oneself (that is, one's form) up to it, is a way of disintegration; poetic form is by definition a means to arrest the disintegration and order the feeling; and in so far as any poetry tends toward the formless, it fails to be expressive of anything."
==See also==
*[[List of fallacies]]
{{GFDL}}
[[Yvor Winters]] is known for his argument attacking the "[[fallacy of imitative form]]," a term which he coined:
:"To say that a [[poet]] is justified in employing a disintegrating form in order to express a feeling of disintegration, is merely a sophistical justification for bad poetry, akin to the Whitmanian notion that one must write loose and sprawling poetry to "express" the loose and sprawling American continent. In fact, all feeling, if one gives oneself (that is, one's form) up to it, is a way of disintegration; poetic form is by definition a means to arrest the disintegration and order the feeling; and in so far as any poetry tends toward the formless, it fails to be expressive of anything."
==See also==
*[[List of fallacies]]
{{GFDL}}